Levels of processing psychology bibliographies cite this. Pdf conducted 10 experiments to evaluate the notion of depth of processing in. The researchers distinguish between shallow and deep processing. The usual procedure followed in their experiments was to present words to subjects and to ask a variety of questions designed to influence depth of processing. Shallow l evels of processing were achieved b y asking about the nature of. Consider some classic examples that demonstrated the ineffectiveness of rehearsal for promoting longterm retention. Visual shortterm memory capacity predicts the bandwidth. The mannwhitney u test also made a clear distinction in the number of words recalled due to deep and shallow processing. Lockhart in 1972, describes memory recall of stimuli as a function of the depth of mental processing. As deeper processing would logically take more time to execute than shallow processing e.
Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. This theory argues that the way information is encoded affects how well is remembered. Each word was presented along with three questions. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Bulletin of the psychonomic society are incidental. Craik and tulving 1975 hypothesized that depth of processing is a main component of the durability of one. View lab report lab 5 from psyc 2300 at university of newcastle. Includes the aim, procedure, results and conclusion of the study. Metodi di studio esperimenti in laboratorio inaugurati da ebbinghaus, 1885 ricerche in contesti naturali iniziate da galton, 1883 e, soprattutto, da bartlett, 1932.
One of the much debated issues in foreignsecond language henceforth l2 pedagogy presently is the following question. To test lop measure durability of memory trace to measure which information is recalled best semantic, structural or phonetic procedure. Pdf depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic. To investigate depth processing by giving participants s number of tasks requiring different levels of processing and measuring recognition. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate a memory enhancing effect for selfimagining in memoryimpaired individuals with neurological damage. It appears that selfimagination of a scene makes the scene very memorable, so much so that even those individuals with very severe memory deficits benefited. By depth of processing, we mean, the way in which a person thinks about a piece of information, for example, a shallow level of processing of a word would be to skim over a sentence and to understand the sentence without dwelling on the individual word. In 1975, the researchers conducted an experiment in which participants were shown a list of 60 words they were then asked to recall certain words by being shown one of three questions, each testing a different level of processing, similar to. Craik and endel tulving university of toronto, toronto, ontario, canada summary ten experiments were designed to explore the levels of processing framework for human memory research proposed by craik and lockhart 1972.
Craik and tulving 1975 wanted to test whether depth of processing affected how well we remember information. In 1975, a series of experiments developed by craik and tulving. Wickelgren, 1977, and the idea that latent memory traces are unconscious, whereas activated ones are conscious e. Craik, endel tulving summary ten experiments were designed to explore the levels of processing framework for human memory research proposed by craik and lockhart 1972. Such mediation could introduce extra complexity into the interpretation of the results and, therefore, was avoided. Physical processing instructions require items to share the same encoding question, and thus can create more competition at recall than items of semantic. The impact of levels of processing independent variable. Craik and tulving 1975 undertook a l ong series of experiments in order to find empirical evidence for this idea. Deeper levels of analysis produce more elaborate, longerlasting, and stronger memory traces than shallow levels of analysis. A processing approach to the working memorylongterm memory. Summary ten experiments were designed to explore the levels of processing framework for human memory research proposed by craik and lockhart 1972.
Dydewalle, delhaye, goessens pictoral advertisements 1985. Design repeated measures same participants used in all conditionsexperiments. The idea of lop emerged as an attempt to explain the mnemonic system. The levels of processing model, created by fergus i. In 1975, a series of experiments developed by craik and tulving explored further the lop framework. Differential involvement of frontotemporal networks nathan s. The mannwhitney u test also made a clear distinction in the number of words recalled due to deep. In a test of the depth hypothesis, craik and tulving 1975 required subjects to make judgments concerning the structural, phonemic, or semantic characteristics of concrete words exposed briefly on a tachistoscope. Craik and tulving, 1975 journal of experimental psychology. One paper is referenced in the lab report guidelines document that you could also use as one of the references. Craik and tulving lop 1975 journal ol experimental. Can be used alongside the introductory presentation and the practical experiment presentation for students on the levels of processing theory see other resources.
Terms in this set 10 to investigate how deep and shallow processing affects memory recall. The ones marked may be different from the article in the profile. Craik and watkins1973 had participants maintain one word for initial recall, varied the amount of time that participants spent rehearsing the word, and then examined the impact on final free recall. Results words of greater meaning were recalled the most effectively merits reconsideration of working memory model craik and tulving 1975 synopsis meaningfulness of words will not influence memory recall modifications.
The levels of processing model craik and lockhart, 1972 focuses on the depth of processing involved in memory, and predicts the deeper information is processed, the longer a memory trace will last. Craik and tulving s research supports their level of processing theory. The deeper the level of processing, the easier the information is to recall. Memory for pictures and words as a function of level of. Participants were given words along with questions about them. A sequence of words was shown and questions that consist of a yes or no response were asked. Depth of processing is defined by how information is encoded and how that changes how it is remembered. To examine whether wm and ltm tests have common principles, craik and tulving s 1975 levelsofprocessing paradigm, which is known to affect ltm, was administered as a wm task. E tulving, s kapur, fi craik, m moscovitch, s houle. Significantly more words were recognised if they had been processed at deep level approximately 65 per cent than either phonetic 37 per cent or shallow 17 per cent levels. In a study from 1975 craik and tulving participants were given a list of 60 words. Some years ago, psychologists fergus craik and endel tulving 1975 conducted a series of experiments to find out.
Selfimagining enhances recognition memory in memoryimpaired. Craik and tulving, 1975 and compare these concepts and findings with those previously reported by p. What is more effective and efficient for l2 vocabulary acquisition. View lab report craik and tulving lop 1975 from psy 330 at college of staten island, cuny.
Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 11, 671684 1972 levels of processing. Presentation to introduce craik and tulving s experiment on the levels of processing theory of memory. Craik and tulving 1975, experiment 7 embedded words in sentence frames that were either simple. Lockhart and craik 1990 introduced the term robust encoding to explain that levels of processing influence the transferappropriate processing in the sense that a more deeply encoded trait becomes accessible to more cues at the time of recall. Buchsbaum2 abstract how does the brain maintain toberemembered informa tion in working memory wm, particularly when the focus of. Tulving and patterson 1968 argued against the notion of information being. Pdf depth of processing and the retention of words in. Under the structuralprocessing condition, subjects indicated whether a word was typed in capital letters. A processing approach to the working memorylongterm. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic. The lop framework can also be explored using only two levels. Although the results of these studies have generally confirmed the predictions of the levels position and its variants in terms of memory for prose, there. Craik and tulving 1975 proposed that congruent items produce enhanced.
This work was done in collaboration with robert lockhart at the university of toronto in 1972 and continued with another collaborative effort with endel tulving in 1975. Which of the three types of encoding do you think would give you the best memory of verbal information. James, 1890, the idea that rehearsal of information in primary memory is a conscious process e. Shortterm retention of a single word relies on retrieval. Procedure first list of words will modified from 60 to 20. The basic notions are that the episodic memory trace may be thought of as a rather automatic byproduct of operations carried. The levels of processing model craik and lockhart, 1972 focuses on the depth of. Pdf conducted 10 experiments to evaluate the notion of depth of processing in human memory. Fergus ian muirden craik frs born 17 april 1935, edinburgh, scotland is a cognitive psychologist known for his research on levels of processing in memory. Lab 5 craik tulving1975 major report guide what this lab.
Depth of processing falls on a shallow to deep continuum. Levels of processing psychology bibliographies cite. Memory for pictures and words as a function of level of processing. Figure 3 from depth of processing and the retention of. These results are replicated in craik and lockhart. Craik has received numerous awards and is considered a leader in the. Participants were presented with a series of 60 words about which they had to answer one of 3. In a test of the depth hypothesis, craik and tulving. The researches done by hyde and jenkins 1973 and craik and tulving 1975 also prove the same results. Levels of processing and zinchenkos approach to memory. Craik and tulving 1975 suggest that an overloading of retrieval cues explanation might serve as an alternative to their elaboration of coding theory of incidental learning data. Participants made uppercase, rhyme, or categorymembership judgments about words, and. In this article we outline some of the main ideas and observations embodied in the levels of processing approach to memory research craik and lockhart, 1972.
The scientific method our experiment background and. This cited by count includes citations to the following articles in scholar. Hemispheric encodingretrieval asymmetry in episodic memory. Pdf depth of processing and the retention of words. Craik and tulving tested this in 10 experiments, each with a study phase and test phase.
1299 96 853 677 803 476 414 447 1256 363 1209 834 532 85 1126 1108 1188 1046 670 654 1486 64 1396 1230 1177 479 556 1323 83 384 267 1390 705 1240 858 352 421 1403 620 48 550 539 1020 1060 367 1465 1446 537 508 1197